ARPANSA: questions to answer
MAPW has asked the ARPANSA CEO to answer for a series of decisions that undermine the agency's integrity and accountability.
Category naval nuclear reactors
Submission to Public Works Committee, Submarine Rotational Force-West
Our submission to the Public Works Committee makes a series of recommendations related to the SRF-W proposal's lack of attention to public health and safety matters.
Fix these issues or sink the nuclear submarine safety bill
In a piece for the Canberra Times, our VP identifies three critical issues with proposed nuclear subs.
Resisting Militarism in the Age of AUKUS
Join this upcoming discussion in Fremantle.
Resisting Militarism in the age of AUKUS
MAPW joins Stop AUKUS WA and friends for a discussion about AUKUS, health, and the path to peace.
Updated naval nuclear safety brief
Our March 2024 safety brief covers key questions on radiation, medical capability, planning, population health and more.
Having a nuclear reactor in their port presents an unacceptable health risk for the people of Hobart
Are we prioritising peace or are we simply paying lip service to it? First published in The Mercury.
Senate Inquiry Upholds Nuclear Prohibitions
MAPW welcomes the majority report of the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee, upholding the prohibitions on nuclear power in Australia.
Independent Regulation is Essential: Naval Nuclear
The government's proposed regulatory arrangements for naval nuclear reactors are just another reason to ditch this dangerous plan.
NAVAL NUCLEAR REACTORS
Naval NuclearReactors Naval nuclear power is a proliferation risk, will cause regional instability, and is incompatible with public opposition to nuclear power. High Risk, High Cost The Australian Government will acquire naval nuclear capability, without consultation with parliament or the…