The Australian War Memorial accepts sponsorship from the world's largest weapons makers.
Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, BAE, Raytheon, and Thales are amongst the largest multinational weapons companies on earth.
They provide cash and in-kind sponsorship of the Australian War Memorial.
These companies reap enormous profits from war. For them, ongoing warfare leads to greater business success.
They have no place in a memorial to our war dead.
Join our campaign to get people with vested interests in war out of our War Memorial.
We're sending postcards to the to the Council of the War Memorial, asking them to commit to commemorate, not commercialise, and to refuse money from weapons companies.
You can help by signing a postcard, and by asking others to sign too.
Request a postcard bundle by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org.
AWM DIRECTOR HAS ACCEPTED PAYMENTS FROM WEAPONS MAKER
The Guardian has confirmed Australian War Memorial director, Dr Brendan Nelson, has personally received payments from weapons maker Thales.
Dr Nelson has been paid an undisclosed amount for his role on a Thales advisory board.
Dr Nelson has accepted sponsorship of the AWM from Thales and other major weapons companies.
Dr Nelson denies any conflict of interest. He says his board role and payment received ministerial approval, and that he has donated his Thales fee to the AWM.
The Medical Association for Prevention of War reiterates its position that AWM sponsorship by weapons companies is contemptible.
Confirmation that Dr Nelson is also in a position to personally benefit from weapons companies compounds the issue.
Brendan Nelson takes job with Boeing, weeks after stepping down as head of Australian War Memorial
Former director Brendan Nelson has taken a senior job with Boeing, a company that gave corporate sponsorship to the AWM. MAPW is quoted as describing the sponsorship as "contemptible".
AWM consultation a box-ticking exercise
The process had the hallmarks of being rushed, poorly executed and, really, not all that important to the Memorial. Boxes about public consultation will be ticked, and the remaking of the AWM will thunder on.
MAPW has submitted a comment under section 74(3) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 on the Memorial’s proposed $498 million redevelopment.
We demean our history when we turn the Australian War Memorial into Disneyland
Read Paul Daley's column in the Guardian, with comment from MAPW VP Dr Margie Beavis.
Emphasising commemoration at the expense of the living?
AWM funding conflict concerns
Should arms dealers really be funding the Australian War Memorial?